tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82308515925564143582024-03-13T21:43:01.645-05:00Swing Right RudieYou're learning all the moves right. You know what to do.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comBlogger460125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-36950761834029052272013-08-22T17:21:00.000-05:002013-08-23T09:22:38.069-05:00From the annals of bad law:<br />
<blockquote>By midcentury some thinkers in the law schools and elsewhere had come to see lawsuits as a kind of surrogate social insurance, identifying deep pockets from whom accident victims might obtain compensation. Justice Roger Traynor of the California Supreme Court, in an influential concurring opinion in a 1944 case called Escola v. Coco-Cola Bottling Co., led the way by proposing that courts should not have to find that manufacturers had behaved negligently to hold them liable for injuries resulting from defects in their products: "Even if there is no negligence … public policy demand that responsibility be fixed wherever it will most effectively reduce the hazards to life and health inherent in defective products that reach the market.”</blockquote>- "The Rule of Lawyers", by Walter Olson, via <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-12/getting-the-liability-out-of-lead-paint.html">Megan Mcardle</a>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-22833766958310532452013-08-13T17:24:00.000-05:002013-08-13T17:24:00.412-05:00The <a href="http://witnesseth.typepad.com/blog/2013/06/the-irs-as-microcosm.html">hyper-partisanship</a> of our bureaucracy:<br />
<blockquote>So has the IRS gone off the rails into hyper-partisanship, leaving behind other more balanced federal agencies? One might imagine that the IRS is different from other federal agencies in ways that would attract employees who more readily support Democratic candidates. Conservative-leaning lawyers might lack the tax-collecting zeal that could lead a lawyer to a career position in the IRS.<br />
<br />
The data show, however, that the partisanship of the lawyers in the IRS is not unsual or even particularly extreme among federal agencies. In fact, the lawyers in every single federal government agency--from the Department of Education to the Department of Defense--contributed overwhelmingly to Obama compared to Romney. </blockquote>Take a look at that table.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-88117550282282520352013-08-12T17:21:00.000-05:002013-08-12T17:21:00.279-05:00Environmental activism commonly doesn't have anything to do with the environment, as evidenced in this article from the environmentalist website The Grist:<br />
<blockquote>The storm has brought a surge of tech-driven initiatives designed to supplant services that have traditionally been viewed as public domain... And on the streets, Google and other companies now run their own, very private version of public transit: a fleet of unmarked buses that shuttle the tech class to and from jobs at corporate campuses south of the city.<br />
<br />
Much has been made of Silicon Valley’s private bus system lately because there is much to be made. The private shuttles ferry upwards of 35,000 workers each day between San Francisco and the sprawling tech company campuses 40-50 miles south. That’s about 35 percent of Caltrain’s ridership, and 17 percent of the number that rides the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system.<br />
<br />
They may use the city’s public bus stops, but these are no ordinary buses. They are pure, gleaming white, unsigned and completely anonymous. Riders flash their work IDs to gain access to these luxury shuttles, each outfitted with wifi, of course.<br />
<br />
“Sometimes the Google Bus just seems like one face of Janus-headed capitalism; it contains the people too valuable even to use public transport or drive themselves,” Rebecca Solnit wrote in an essay at the London Review of Books.</blockquote>When private companies unroll programs for their employees to ride-share, simultaneously lowering congestion and CO2 emissions, they are greeted with <a href="http://grist.org/cities/the-dark-side-of-startup-city/">outright hostility and anti-capitalist vitriol</a>. This has nothing to do with the environment.<br />
Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-11500270516887363162013-08-11T13:15:00.000-05:002013-08-11T13:15:00.767-05:00Environmental regulations <a href="http://lfb.org/today/how-government-wrecked-the-gas-can/">don't help the environment</a>, and ruin everyday things while they are at it:<br />
<blockquote>The whole trend began in (wait for it) California. Regulations began in 2000, with the idea of preventing spillage. The notion spread and was picked up by the EPA, which is always looking for new and innovative ways to spread as much human misery as possible.<br />
<br />
An ominous regulatory announcement from the EPA came in 2007: “Starting with containers manufactured in 2009… it is expected that the new cans will be built with a simple and inexpensive permeation barrier and new spouts that close automatically.”<br />
<br />
The government never said “no vents.” It abolished them de facto with new standards that every state had to adopt by 2009. So for the last three years, you have not been able to buy gas cans that work properly. They are not permitted to have a separate vent. The top has to close automatically. There are other silly things now, too, but the biggest problem is that they do not do well what cans are supposed to do.<br />
<br />
And don’t tell me about spillage. It is far more likely to spill when the gas is gurgling out in various uneven ways, when one spout has to both pour and suck in air. That’s when the lawn mower tank becomes suddenly full without warning, when you are shifting the can this way and that just to get the stuff out.<br />
<br />
There’s also the problem of the exploding can. On hot days, the plastic models to which this regulation applies can blow up like balloons. When you release the top, gas flies everywhere, including possibly on a hot engine. Then the trouble really begins.</blockquote>This happened to me just a few weeks ago, I hit the release button on the gas can, and was rewarded with a geyser of fuel arching over the top of my lawnmower, a spill far worse than I've ever had with a traditional gas can.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-87362439202025461702013-08-10T13:04:00.000-05:002013-08-10T13:04:00.395-05:00Americans are <a href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/americans-are-far-more-compassionate-than-socially-conscious-europeans/">far more generous</a> than every European nation:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-P4Gm_nnMKZ0/UgKMYz43yGI/AAAAAAAAASw/Cu3KOXWUF8o/s1600/voluntary-social-expenditure-in-oecd-nations.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-P4Gm_nnMKZ0/UgKMYz43yGI/AAAAAAAAASw/Cu3KOXWUF8o/s400/voluntary-social-expenditure-in-oecd-nations.jpg" /></a></div>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-81991662963645273922013-08-09T17:10:00.000-05:002013-08-09T17:10:00.714-05:00Michael Totten sets the record straight on <a href="http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/michael-j-totten/tunisia-brink">the Prime Minister of Tunisia</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Ennahda is described as “moderate” in almost every single article published by wire agency hacks, but the only reason it’s relatively moderate is because it’s forced to share power. Tunisia’s Islamists conceded to building a civil state instead of an Islamic state because they face massive resistance and they don’t have enough seats in the parliament to do anything else. Since the police and the army are loyal to the country and not the party, that’s that. If Ennahda had won a majority and had the strength to muscle everything through, we would be looking at a different Tunisia—an Egypt in the Maghreb.</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-54209700338233635892013-08-08T18:08:00.000-05:002013-08-08T18:08:00.717-05:00Apparently radio was once <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-29/of-music-payola-and-disclosure.html">controlled by the mob</a>:<br />
<blockquote>From the late 1970s through 1986, radio was controlled by the mob, and you had a lot of people getting hundred dollar bills in record sleeves or cocaine hidden inside cassette tapes.... Yes, the Gambino family. There's a great book on payola in the 1980s by Fredric Dannen called "Hit Men." Basically, there was a cartel of consultants called "The Network" that bribed programmers and was extorting money from record labels. If you didn't pay their billings they'd blacklist your artists.Most famously they had Pink Floyd kicked off the LA airwaves during an extremely successful concert tour as retaliation against their label.This cartel was connected to Piney Armone, a Gambino underboss. </blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-59426790069985873802013-08-07T17:59:00.000-05:002013-08-07T17:59:00.604-05:00<a href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/does-the-war-on-poverty-fight-destitution-or-subsidize-it/">The War on Poverty has failed</a>:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tLzWJqJsIIE/UgKKsJprwFI/AAAAAAAAASU/WLV4gxhxcAU/s1600/failed-war-on-poverty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tLzWJqJsIIE/UgKKsJprwFI/AAAAAAAAASU/WLV4gxhxcAU/s400/failed-war-on-poverty.jpg" /></a></div>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-76457283067757277302013-08-06T17:55:00.000-05:002013-08-07T12:55:54.441-05:00There is no <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/an-employment-number-that-isnt-budging/">recovery</a>:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u_NSyzhTKtY/UgKJpSyrU0I/AAAAAAAAASE/O6XIJif_yMw/s1600/employment-share.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u_NSyzhTKtY/UgKJpSyrU0I/AAAAAAAAASE/O6XIJif_yMw/s400/employment-share.png" /></a></div><br />
Diana Carew <a href="http://www.progressivepolicy.org/2013/08/no-recovery-for-young-people/">reports</a> "in July 2013, just 36 percent of Americans age 16-24 <i>not</i> enrolled in school worked full-time, 10 percent less than in July 2007."Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-23847549039455760722013-04-24T17:12:00.000-05:002013-04-24T17:12:00.048-05:00<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/346517/more-dependency">Quote of the day</a>:<br />
<blockquote>It is not dependence per se, which is a universal fact of human life, but dependence without mutual obligation, that corrupts the soul. Such technocratic provision enables precisely the illusion of independence from the people around us and from the requirements of any moral code they might uphold. It is corrosive not because it instills a true sense of dependence but because it inspires a false sense of independence and so frees us from the sorts of moral habits of mutual obligation that alone can make us free.</blockquote>-Yuval LevinHajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-61545404332030348472013-04-05T17:30:00.000-05:002013-04-05T17:30:01.618-05:00<blockquote>There is broad scientific consensus that genetically engineered crops currently on the market are safe to eat. After 14 years of cultivation and a cumulative total of 2 billion acres planted, no adverse health or environmental effects have resulted from commercialization of genetically engineered crops (Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, National Research Council and Division on Earth and Life Studies 2002). Both the U.S. National Research Council and the Joint Research Centre (the European Union’s scientific and technical research laboratory and an integral part of the European Commission) have concluded that there is a comprehensive body of knowledge that adequately addresses the food safety issue of genetically engineered crops (Committee on Identifying and Assessing Unintended Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods on Human Health and National Research Council 2004; European Commission Joint Research Centre 2008).<br />
<br />
These and other recent reports conclude that the processes of genetic engineering and conventional breeding are no different in terms of unintended consequences to human health and the environment (European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2010)...<br />
<br />
Still, to date, compounds with harmful effects on humans or animals have been documented only in foods developed through conventional breeding approaches. For example, conventional breeders selected a celery variety with relatively high amounts of psoralens to deter insect predators that damage the plant. Some farm workers who harvested such celery developed a severe skin rash—an unintended consequence of this breeding strategy (Committee on Identifying and Assessing Unintended Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods on Human Health and National Research Council 2004).</blockquote>-<a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/11/genetically-engineered-crops/">Scientific American</a> (online), Aug, 2011.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-35718451545959470922013-04-04T17:22:00.000-05:002013-04-04T17:22:00.199-05:00The Economist is changing its tune, "<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21574461-climate-may-be-heating-up-less-response-greenhouse-gas-emissions">The climate may be heating up less</a> in response to greenhouse-gas emissions than was once thought."<br />
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-J2hHGeFTHsU/UVn6Wy8KacI/AAAAAAAAARM/aVV2_kN6Vk8/s1600/climate_change_falling_off_scale.png" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-J2hHGeFTHsU/UVn6Wy8KacI/AAAAAAAAARM/aVV2_kN6Vk8/s320/climate_change_falling_off_scale.png" /></a>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-89049214684065485932013-04-03T17:19:00.000-05:002013-04-03T17:19:00.653-05:00<a href="http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/michael-j-totten/northern-lebanon-burning">Realpolitik in the Middle East</a>:<br />
<blockquote>This is one of the reasons conspiracy theories are popular in the Middle East. Bizarre conspiracies actually happen in this part of the world. It’s “normal.” The Syrian regime has been pulling stunts like that one for decades.<br />
<br />
The liberal Syrian dissident Ammar Abdulhamid recently highlighted <a href="https://now.mmedia.me/lb/en/commentaryanalysis/why-nonviolence-failed-in-syria">similar shenanigans</a> in NOW Lebanon: “The campaign by the Assad regime included releasing known jihadist and terrorist elements from state prisons at the same time nonviolent protest leaders were imprisoned. This tactic is sometimes called ‘tailoring your enemies.’ It is inherently a risky approach, but can serve to divide enemy ranks by creating a more radical camp in their midst, and in this case, undermining the advocates of nonviolence. This tactic had been repeatedly used by the Assad regime during the Lebanese civil war, allowing it to emerge as the main power broker there.”</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-84720682867558929542013-04-02T17:16:00.000-05:002013-04-02T17:16:00.103-05:00<blockquote>"Every time we look at them, they want more money. Like pigs, you know. Here we’re slaving, and we’re starving and the goddamn workers don’t give a s--- about anything.”</blockquote>-<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/the-madness-of-cesar-chavez/308557/">Cesar Chavez, man of the people</a>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-39376951905244284282013-04-02T17:06:00.000-05:002013-04-02T17:06:00.454-05:00A <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/white-men-have-much-to-discuss-about-mass-shootings/2013/03/29/7b001d02-97f3-11e2-814b-063623d80a60_story.html">Washington Post op-ed</a> claims:<br />
<blockquote>Nearly all of the mass shootings in this country in recent years — not just Newtown, Aurora, Fort Hood, Tucson and Columbine — have been committed by white men and boys.</blockquote>However, that's not what the <a href="http://www.bob-owens.com/2013/03/wapost-op-ed-blames-whites-for-mass-shootings-facts-remain-minorities-are-over-represented-for-all-murder-types-including-mass-murder/">facts</a> say:<br />
<blockquote>Whites are under-represented by race in mass shootings, as are Hispanics, when you look at percentage of total population. Don’t take my word for it, either; look at the stats kept by <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data">über-left-wing Mother Jones</a>.<br />
<br />
Over-represented are Asians, like Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho, One L. Goh, Jeong Soo Paek, Jiverly Wong, Byran Koji Uyesugi and Gang Lu who are all East Asian, and West Asian/Arabs, such as Nidal Hassan, and Abdelkrim Belachheb, whom the sisters dishonestly label “white.”<br />
<br />
Also over-represented are black mass murders like Omar S. Thornton, Maurice Clemmons, Charles Lee Thornton, William D. Baker, Arthur Wise, Clifton McCree, Nathan Dunlap, Colin Ferguson, and we’re not even including the DC Snipers, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, because they are arguably serial killers instead.</blockquote>There are some problems with the Mother Jones data, but, this is basically right.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-30221276066108080992013-04-01T17:13:00.000-05:002013-04-01T17:13:00.228-05:00<a href="http://monthlyreview.org/2011/05/01/woody-guthrie-redder-than-remembered">Woody Guthrie, Liberal Fascist</a>:<br />
<blockquote>In a 1941 version of the song, “Talking Columbia,” Guthrie sang: <br />
<br />
<blockquote>“Well, the folks need houses and stuff to eat,<br><br />
And the folks need metals and the folks need wheat.<br><br />
Folks need water and power dams,<br><br />
And folks need people and the people need the land”.</blockquote><br />
But by “circa 1947,” after the war, Guthrie had substituted “folks” with “Uncle Sam,” shifting the focus from the needs of the people to the needs of the state, and effectively blurring the distinction between the two. This was an expression of Popular Front politics just as much as it was a result of Guthrie’s own changing views, but it gets to the heart of his full-throated support for the war effort, even in its most cruel and violent expressions.</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-5551342537541283682013-03-30T12:10:00.000-05:002013-03-30T12:10:01.022-05:00Day-age theory on the <a href="http://agentintellect.blogspot.com/2011/02/bible-and-age-of-universe-part-1.html">Bible and the Age of the Universe</a>.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-41319452255526882232013-03-27T17:06:00.000-05:002013-03-27T17:06:00.619-05:00<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628804578348050712410108.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">How the government killed swing</a>:<br />
<blockquote>In 1944, a new wartime cabaret tax went into effect, imposing a ruinous 30% (later merely a destructive 20%) excise on all receipts at any venue that served food or drink and allowed dancing. ... [I]n the next few years, struggling nightclub owners were trying every which way to avoid having to foist the tax on customers.<br />
<br />
The tax-law regulation's ... exception had the biggest impact. Clubs that provided strictly instrumental music to which no one danced were exempt from the cabaret tax. It is no coincidence that in the back half of the 1940s a new and undanceable jazz performed primarily by small instrumental groups—bebop—emerged as the music of the moment.<br />
<br />
"The spotlight was on instrumentalists because of the prohibitive entertainment taxes," the great bebop drummer Max Roach was quoted in jazz trumpeter Dizzy Gillespie's memoirs, "To Be or Not to Bop." "You couldn't have a big band because the big band played for dancing."<br />
<br />
The federal excise tax inadvertently spurred the bebop revolution: "If somebody got up to dance, there would be 20% more tax on the dollar. If someone got up there and sang a song, it would be 20% more," Roach said. "It was a wonderful period for the development of the instrumentalist."</blockquote>h/t <a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2013/03/how-federal-.html">taxprof</a>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-56450896105914848982013-03-26T17:38:00.000-05:002013-03-26T17:38:00.552-05:00The Pew Research Center's "<a href="http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/the-changing-tv-news-landscape/">The State of the News Media in 2013</a>" on the mix of reporting and opinion in the cable news business:<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-B032Zm714mY/UUeI63cZ_sI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/m4ApJqS9_30/s1600/Cable-News-Opinion-Dominates-Reporting.png" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-B032Zm714mY/UUeI63cZ_sI/AAAAAAAAAQ8/m4ApJqS9_30/s320/Cable-News-Opinion-Dominates-Reporting.png" /></a><br />
<blockquote>In prime time, opinion exceeds reporting at all three channels. Not so in the daytime. CNN maintains higher levels of straight reporting in both the morning and mid-day. Fox’s morning programming is a pretty even mix of reporting and opinion, with opinion overtaking reporting in mid-day. At MSNBC, opinion overwhelms reporting in both the morning and at mid-day.</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-19152265585224691022013-03-25T17:16:00.000-05:002013-03-25T17:16:00.590-05:00How ABC manufactured a <a href="http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-abcs-of-journalisms-eroding.html">fake controversy about so called "pink slime"</a>:<br />
<blockquote>In particular, the latest example has been ABC’s lax ethics that visited devastation on a company with a thirty-year history of safe operation, Beef Products, Inc. The company pioneered the provision of lean, finely textured beef which is blended with fattier hamburger to make it more learn and nutritious. It also protects it against pathogens with a process that won the coveted 2007 “Black Pearl” award from the International Association for Food Protection.<br />
<br />
ABC reporter Jim Avila, in hot pursuit of a journalism award, wrote a series of reports claiming that BPI was producing “pink slime” with the network hyping the term by using it 52 times in a two-week period in March. Any reporter investigating BPI would have swiftly found a mountain of evidence exonerating the company from any hint of the allegations made against it.<br />
<br />
Avila’s reporting put BPI in jeopardy of closing down entirely, forcing the suspension of business at plants in Texas, Kansas, and Iowa, while the headquarters plant in Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, struggles to continue operations. So far 650 employees have lost their jobs with several thousand more jobs at risk at companies that relied on BPI, affecting their families and communities...<br />
<br />
The product in its present form has been used for more than a decade with coverage in the Washington Post, the New York Times, a Hollywood movie and more! As for the “experts” in Avila’s reports, he chose a former federal bureaucrat who called the product “pink slime” in a ten-year-old email to fellow employees at the Department of Agriculture.<br />
<br />
In an April Bloomberg Business Week article, reporters, Bryan Gruley and Elizabeth Campbell examined the way BPI had been subjected to “sliming”, noting that its finely textured lean beef had been purchased for use by McDonald’s, Wal-Mart Stores, Burger King, Kroger, Taco Bell, and scores of grocers for many years. In short, if you have had a hamburger in the past decade, you have eaten lean finely textured beef and enjoyed it.<br />
<br />
Avila repeated the formula in July when ABC aired a story about “super bugs” that it alleged was a strain of bacteria in chicken that could lead to urinary infections in women. ABC did acknowledge that “there is no study showing a definitive link between the presence of e-coli in chicken and infection in women…” but not until viewers had become alarmed by the report.<br />
<br />
Ashley Peterson, Ph.D., the vice president of science and technology for the National Chicken Council, noted that, even if there was a “super bug”, it would be easily avoidable through “proper cooking and handling of poultry products, because all bacteria, resistant or not, are killed by proper cooking.” Cooking meat properly is a 10,000 year-old practice, but when someone forgets to do it, Avila and ABC thinks it is news.</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-10363247334085950352013-03-24T11:25:00.000-05:002013-03-24T11:25:00.762-05:00<a href="http://www.newgeography.com/content/003456-why-are-there-so-many-murders-chicago?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Newgeography+%28Newgeography.com+-+Economic,+demographic,+and+political+commentary+about+places%29&utm_content=Google+Reader">Why are there so many murders in Chicago?</a> The New Geography offers some possibilities:<br />
<ol><li>The number of police officers<br />
<li>Police tactics<br />
<li>Politically controlled policing<br />
<li>William Bratton<br />
<li>Gang fragmentation<br />
<li>Depopulation<br />
<li>Public housing demolitions</ol>Numbers one to three are the most convincing, however, note that the example of police tactics, "stop and frisk", is moderately recent, and came after the most dramatic reductions in New York, where the important tactical shifts relied mostly on data analysis and broken windows theory of crime enforcement.<br />
Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-32641736004074931632013-03-23T10:21:00.000-05:002013-03-23T10:21:00.189-05:00Megan Mcardle walks <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/15/sorry-folks-one-way-or-the-other-you-ll-never-be-able-to-count-on-retirement.html">through pension history</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The UAW, which represented Studebaker's employers (some of the highest paid in the auto industry, by the way), had not only allowed the company to stretch out its payments into the fund, but had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/30pensions.html?pagewanted=print">arguably actually encouraged it</a>, because the alternative was lower wages. Nonetheless, workers were devastated.<br />
</blockquote>So, that gave use the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC).<br />
<blockquote>ERISA mandated that companies had to keep their pensions funded at all times--if a company had a shortfall, they had to make it up immediately, and no, we don't care if the union said it was all right. But this, it turned out, created a new problem. The assets in pension funds tended to fall precipitously during recessions. So, of course, did company profits. So the law demanded that companies put millions of dollars into pension plans just when they were least able. Pushing companies into bankruptcy wouldn't do anyone any good: the PBGC would have to make up the shortfall, the workers would get less (because the PBGC makes them take a haircut), and of course, the corporate shareholders would lose their whole investment. <br />
<br />
Companies could have dealt with this problem by overfunding during boom years... But even if they wanted to do this (and I'm not sure that many did), there were structural reasons that they couldn't. Instead of requiring them to behave sensibly, the government required them not to.<br />
<br />
Overstuffed pension plans were often an attractive target for LBO operators, who would "unlock" the cash (and pay it out to bondholders or themselves). Worse, they became a target of the IRS. An overfunded pension fund can, in slightly unscrupulous hands, be used as a tool for tax management: stuff the funds in during very profitable years, take them out later when you want them. The IRS takes a dim view of such maneuvers, and therefore essentially forces employers to stop contributing to overfunded defined benefit pension plans, or add new benefits.</blockquote>Megan goes on to discuss proposals for shifting more to Social Security, pointing out that it carries all the same problems, but with greater risk. Read the whole thing.Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-3422438768446983682013-03-22T17:00:00.000-05:002013-03-22T17:00:06.137-05:00An interesting technical note on the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/339244/government-spending-and-gdp-veronique-de-rugy">calculation of GDP</a>:<br />
<blockquote>As George Mason University’s Garett Jones <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/339244/government-spending-and-gdp-veronique-de-rugy">rightfully notes</a> government spending raises GDP “by definition.” That, however, doesn’t mean that the GDP boost induced by government hiring, for instance, is real or more productive than private hiring. For private hiring to boost GDP, something valuable has to be produced: Not so for government. As he explains:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Hiring a worker who (through no fault of her own) accomplishes absolutely nothing raises GDP if the government does the hiring. Hiring a worker who (through no fault of her own) accomplishes absolutely nothing does nothing to GDP if the private sector does the hiring. <br />
<br />
Why? Because GDP counts government salaries as “government expenditures” as soon as the government hires a person. But the “consumption” and “investment” parts of GDP only count genuine purchases by the private sector (leaving the oddities of imputed spending for the coda below). So if a private sector product spends years in the incubator, burning through thousands of person-hours of work and millions of dollars of salary–but never sees the light of day–then the product never shows up in GDP. But if the government had hired those same workers who worked just as long on a similarly fruitless project, their labor would give a big boost to GDP. Government hiring creates GDP by definition. Private hiring only creates GDP if the worker actually creates a product. </blockquote><br />
The reverse is true. Reduction in government spending may cause a temporary shrinkage of GDP, but it doesn’t always mean that something valuable has been destroyed.</blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-24451246754400806132013-03-21T17:24:00.000-05:002013-03-21T17:24:00.511-05:00The left-leaning Brookings Institution on <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/brown-center-chalkboard/posts/2013/01/23-prek-whitehurst">universal preschool</a>:<br />
<blockquote>This relatively recent explosion of public pre-K programs has been underpinned by research findings from two iconic preschool interventions from 30 to 40 years ago whose participants have been followed into adulthood, the Perry Preschool Project and the Abecedarian Project... In my view, generalizations to state pre-K programs from research findings on Perry and Abecedarian are prodigious leaps of faith. Perry and Abecedarian were multi-year intensive interventions whereas state pre-K programs are overwhelmingly one year programs for four-year-olds. Costs per participant for Perry and Abecedarian were multiples of the levels of investment in present-day state preschool programs, e.g., $90,000 per child for Abecedarian.[3] Both Perry and Abecedarian were small hothouse programs (less than 100 participants) run by very experienced, committed teams, whereas widely deployed present day preschool programs are, well, widely deployed. The circumstances of the very poor families of the Black children who were served by these model programs 30 to 40 years ago are very different from those faced by the families that are presently served by publicly funded preschool programs. <br />
<br />
But we do have the Head Start findings I reviewed last week and we should not ignore them in thinking about state pre-K. Head Start spends about twice as much per child per year as states ($8K per child per year for Head Start vs. $4K for state pre-K). And Head Start includes many program components that are advocated by early childhood experts such as health, nutrition, and parental involvement that are much less prevalent in state pre-K. If a year of Head Start does not improve achievement in elementary school, should we assume that a year of state pre-K does?<br />
<br />
These three studies fall far short of providing a convincing case for investment in universal pre-K: The Georgia study finds impacts that are at best very small and do not pass a cost-benefit test. The Texas study provides evidence for value in a targeted program and is silent on the effectiveness of a universal program. The Tulsa study and other studies that use a design that compares children who just meet or just miss the age cut-off for pre-K can't estimate the impact of state pre-K because they are comparing children that may differ in many experiences in addition to their participation in state pre-K. </blockquote>Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8230851592556414358.post-16877851204532971322013-03-20T17:23:00.000-05:002013-03-20T17:23:00.406-05:00Is it rational to <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/13/can-saving-fix-the-us-wealth-gap.html">neglect savings</a> in favor of conspicuous consumption?Hajji Reidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10419528374485428237noreply@blogger.com